SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
lightshipsailor
To: isopatch who wrote (763132)5/21/2022 6:53:09 PM
From: skinowski1 Recommendation   of 793927
 
Sorry, you’re right, of course. I meant in general, globally.

Maybe a combination of nuclear and fossil would be best. No particular advantage in giving up one or the other. And certainly, both are better than paying 4-6 times higher costs for wind or sun.

Iceland has it made - at least as of back some years ago, when I visited there, 90% of their electricity came from geothermal sources. But - it’s a small and special place.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News