| | | >> No, because I have no idea WTF the closing times between Fulton County and Detroit have to do with anything.
I don't, either -- but historically, that has not been done. Historically, votes are counted until the work is done. In the case of Detroit, they then put up barriers so observers could not see the counting floor:
It could mean nothing, but in my experience when it Just Doesn't Look Right (JDLR) it needs to be investigated. In the case of Georgia, experienced counters shut down counting at 10:30pm which has NEVER been done in the US before unless counting is finished or there was some major catastrophe. Then, they decided to count ballots with no one observing. Probably nothing but we will never know.
The USA has always been a place where elections were considered relatively fair. These weren't.
Let me put it to you this way. If this is some sort of "smoking gun" that points to election fraud, then the well-paid lawyers who were tasked with finding it should have had no problem going to the source and finding such obvious evidence. The entire idea behind the theft was that it be done in a way that allows for theft without getting caught. If you get caught, it defeats the purpose. It is quite presumptuous to expect that the thieves aren't better at it than those of us armed with TV sets at home.
But you have to understand Democrats are experienced cheaters. They are better at litigation than Republicans. For example, in 1981 Republicans were accused of "intimidation" in the NJ governors race. The case was settled, but the Carter-appointed judge in the case ordered a consent decree limiting Republican involvement in poll watching.
This Democrat judge never ended the consent decree -- Republicans were not allowed to have poll watchers. Every year, instead of calling an end to it, the judge would just renew it. Even after he retired 15 years later, he was able to maintain control of it. NOT UNTIL AFTER HE DIED IN 2015 and it was assigned to another judge, were Republicans released from not being able to have poll-watchers. At times the judge even added requirements and made it stronger at Democrats' requests.
Poll watchers are important people because they do more than "watch". They follow up with their voters to make sure they're at the correct polling place, deal with malfunctions and they RNC was blocked from litigation related to Election Day events for all these years. This was the first presidential election after getting out from under this decree and they hardly knew what to do or how to do it. No one talks about it but it is important as hell.
The point here is there is a ton of nuance to the way in which Democrats are able to cheat. And all those forces came together in Nov 2020 as part of the theft.
>> Increasing access for voters in districts favorable to you is as old as the American Republic itself.
Yes. But never have private funds been dumped into local election operations which designated to the block level how it was to be spent, where modern Data Management techniques could determine in advance that if you spend $x1 on a storefront here with a dropbox out front, open from 10am until 9pm, you could bring in x2 net Democrat voters who otherwise would not vote. In fact, contributions of this nature had not been used before. When the grants first came out, there were personnel in Wisconsin proclaiming, "We can't do this! It is like selling this office to Democrats!" And that is exactly what it was.
This was not about increasing access for voters. You have to get over that.
It was about suppressing the proportion of Red votes in particular areas where it mattered most. But unlike Cambridge Analytica, which the left howled about, it was done with payments of money, not with promotion of better government. It was buying an election.
IF this is the game you want to play, where the best regression models win the race, our entire system is going to fall apart at once.
Going forward, if you want to have a fair election, vote totals by district simply cannot work. And this race was stolen with that technique.
Voting doesn't matter when Zuckerberg controls the outcome? I don't see the point.
Our voting system is not defunct and needs to be shitcanned and replaced with modern systems that are not subject to such manipulation. It isn't rocket science. Every day you do more complicated things in your job than what it would take to develop a system that secure, bulletproof, and encourages everyone to participate without leaving the convenience of their home.
A 90 year old woman of any background today knows how to conduct business on her cell phone. The USPS is on its death bed. It is time to leave archaic behind and develop fair, workable voting systems where Democrats cannot steal votes. |
|
