SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The_Commodore who wrote (70803)7/29/2022 11:38:04 PM
From: petal1 Recommendation

Recommended By
E_K_S

  Read Replies (2) of 78732
 
one way of looking at it is just mean reversion ... largely a reduction back in line to 2019 levels.
Seems that most everything is reverting back to 2019 levels – and maybe below. It would make logical sense, to me, as we need to pay for the depression expenditures we spent in 2020, taking out a massive, collective global loan which we charged to the indefinite future.

* * *

Milton Friedman said in an excellent speech* on the topic, that throughout modern history, it has taken about 2 years for gov't expenditures to turn into inflation.

His main point on inflation was, quite simply, that the cause for inflation was always: gov't spending &/ the quantity of money.

If we look at M2 money**, it would seem to prove him quite right indeed this time around. (Sharp increase in quantity of money 2020, sharp increase in inflation ~18 months later (24 in Europe.))

Where the 70's inflation came from, though, isn't clear using Friedman's perspective, regardless of which money supply (M0, M1, M2, or M3) you look at.

_________________________________________________________

* youtube.com
** tradingeconomics.com
_________________________________________________________
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext