Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

pocotrader

rdkflorida2

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1370275)	8/10/2022 5:48:32 PM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 1577886

They also have every reason, politically, to not indict him, at least until they charge him for something major, like fake electors. If you're gonna risk armed mobs, it had better be for something more substantial than violations of the records act. I don't agree with the above. Trump has committed so many crimes they have a wealth of charges. Records act violations seem disconnected from all the other crimes (fake electors, incitement, conspiracy to stop the electoral vote count). It seems an open and shut case. Did he still have presidential records at MAL or not? If he did, he's guilty of that crime and its a crime that would block him from holding office again. They can still charge with other crimes later. Re the records act violations, he might even get a soft penalty ... some kind of house arrest, perhaps. Which he would violate out of spite but the option of locking him up is still there. As to armed mobs, we're gonna have them anyway. Might as well put them down early on. We can't be buffaloed by the threat of mob violence.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next