Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

Winfastorlose

To: Winfastorlose who wrote (1371728)	8/23/2022 9:57:56 AM
From: Sdgla	1 Recommendation of 1579725

Based on Corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s Ruling in Bill Clinton Case, FBI Broke the Law When It Stole President Trump’s Documents at Mar-a-Lago This, however, is now reason to classify the FBI’s raid in Mar-a-Lago as a crime. Redstate notes: Advertisement - story continues below Clinton made audio tapes with historian Taylor Branch during his presidency and for a period of time, they were even kept in his sock drawer. Branch recorded seventy-nine audiotapes that “preserved not only President Clinton’s thoughts and commentary on contemporaneous events and issues he was facing as president, but, in some instances, recorded actual events such as presidential telephone conversations. Judicial Watch sued to have the tapes included in the National Archives. But U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president. What’s interesting about the case is what it says in regard to a president’s sweeping power over records. But Jackson’s ruling — along with the Justice Department’s arguments that preceded it — made some other sweeping declarations that have more direct relevance to the FBI’s decision to seize handwritten notes and files Trump took with him to Mar-a-Lago. The most relevant is that a president’s discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and solely his, as is his ability to declassify or destroy records at will. Advertisement - story continues below Homeowners Are Trading in Their Doorbell Cams for This. Homeowners Are Trading in Their Doorbell Cams for This. Keilini.com Texas: New Gov Bill Covers Cost to Install Solar in These Zip Codes Texas: New Gov Bill Covers Cost to Install Solar in These Zip Codes Finance Daily This Lightbulb Security Camera is Sweeping Local Area Now! This Lightbulb Security Camera is Sweeping Local Area Now! Keilini “Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President’s term and in his sole discretion,” Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed. “Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records,” she added. The judge also noted it would be wrong to seize the tapes from Clinton, that it was an “extraordinary request” that was “unfounded, contrary to the PRA’s express terms, and contrary to traditional principles of administrative law. The Court agrees.” If the Archives wants to challenge a decision, that agency and the attorney general can initiate an enforcement mechanism under the law, but it is a civil procedure and has no criminal penalty, she noted.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next