SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
bentway
Eric L
To: Lane3 who wrote (249978)9/2/2022 8:54:58 AM
From: Doo2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 361737
 
Here's the paragraph that references Attachment F (the photo):

The investigative team has reviewed all the materials in the containers that the privilege review team did not segregate as potentially attorney-client privileged. Of the Seized Evidence, thirteen boxes or containers contained documents with classification markings,and in all, over one hundred unique documents with classification markings—that is, more than twice the amount produced on June 3, 2022, in response to the grand jury subpoena—were seized. Certain of the documents had colored cover sheets indicating their classification status. See, e.g., Attachment F (redacted FBI photograph of certain documents and classified cover sheets recovered from a container in the “45 office”). The classification levels ranged from CONFIDENTIAL to TOP SECRET information, and certain documents included additional sensitive compartments that signify very limited distribution. In some instances, even the FBI counterintelligence personnel and DOJ attorneys conducting the review required additional clearances before they were permitted to review certain documents.

The purpose of the photo is obvious to anyone other than a whore like Turdley and his parrots. Lawyers who know what they are doing, follow court rules, and are ethical, actually are obliged to cite sources for factual claims made in pleadings. The paragraph makes factual statements, attempting to demonstrate to the judge that those facts are important in context, have an identifiable source, and not just pulled out of DOJ's ass. Note that many of the documents have redaction of the entire first page behind the cover sheets on many.

Unlike Trump's doofus lawyers who have already filed two pleadings in this case so far with almost no citation to any documented support for their factual claims, nothing in the paragraph or Attachment F is inappropriate. If Turdley ever tried a case or even represented a client in his life, I'd guess he knows this full well. But, a whore's gotta whore if he wants to stay relevant and have his name and face in the spotlight.

Worth noting is footnote 6 which is on the same page as most of the paragraph I quoted. It explains why the passports were properly seized, if anyone is interested in that little factoid the Doofus "truthed" about. :)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext