China Trade War heats up: China is suspending all imports from Australia and New Zealand including dairy, beef, agricultural products and wines with immediate effect, a significant escalation of tensions between China and its pacific neighbors, the country’s official logistics trade association, China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing (CFLP), has announced.
vino-joy.com
Of course China knows Bolsonaro and Brazil are friends of China and will cover the gap wherever possible.
The US counter attacks
US ramps up China tech sanctions faster than expected
BY SCOTT FOSTER
SEPTEMBER 02, 2022
In another step aimed at stifling China’s technological advance, the US Department of Commerce has decided to restrict shipments of advanced graphics processing units (GPUs) designed by American companies NVIDIA and AMD to China. The US government says it is worried about potential military applications of these products.
GPUs are a type of integrated circuit used in graphics and video image generation, high-performance computing and the acceleration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. NVIDIA and AMD, both based in California, are the 9 and 10 largest semiconductor companies in the world as ranked by revenue in 2021.
The stock prices of both companies dropped on the sanctions news, NVIDIA’s precipitously. After falling 12% intraday, NVIDIA’s shares closed down 7.7% on September 1. AMD closed down 3.0%. Both stocks fell further in after-hours trading.
But let’s put the news in wider context. Nvidia was down 59.8% from its 52-week high (highest price in the past year) and AMD down 49.9%. Both stocks peaked last November.
Applied Materials, the largest maker of semiconductor production equipment, dropped 2.4% on September 1 and was down 45.0% from its 52-week high. Intel declined by only 0.5% on September 1 but was down 43.6% from its 52-week high. The SOX semiconductor index has declined by 35.5% since peaking last December.
In the short term, the new restrictions on NVIDIA and AMD are simply the latest in a series of negative signals that have brought the recent semiconductor bull market to an end.
Looking ahead, however, they make it clear that the semiconductor industry can no longer plan on selling its newest and most advanced products in China. Companies’ growth prospects and return on investment may be reduced and their share prices may thus test new lows.
EDA software used in high-end chip design is the latest technology the US is trying to keep out of the hands of China. Image: Twitter
On August 12, the Commerce Department announced restrictions on exports of electronic design automation (EDA) tools to China. This prompted Handel Jones, CEO of electronics industry consulting firm International Business Strategies, to write that such restrictions might “have catastrophic impact worldwide,” resulting in “major disruptions of the global electronics industry.”
Jones also noted that “The situation is very serious for China. The past pattern of the US government has been to expand the definition of its initial decision over time to increase the impact, and this will likely be the case with the present ruling.”
See: US goes for EDA jugular in China chips war
In this case, new sanctions have followed within less than a month.
But it’s not a catastrophe yet. The Commerce Department has allowed NVIDIA to continue exporting its A100 GPU in order to support US customers and even to transfer technologyfor the development of its new H100 device to China, both through September 1, 2023.
But a great deal of uncertainty has been created. NVIDIA has warned that the impact on its revenues could reach hundreds of millions of dollars. AMD does not seem as worried, at least not yet.
EDA tools and GPUs are not the only products subject to recent US export controls. On August 12, the Commerce Department also put restrictions on semiconductor substrates made of gallium oxide and diamond, and on pressure gain combustion (PGC) technology, which improves the performance of gas turbines.
As noted by the department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) in its press release:
“Gallium Oxide and diamond are materials that allow semiconductors that use them to work under more severe conditions, such as at higher voltages or higher temperatures. Devices that utilize these materials have significantly increased military potential.
“PGC technology has the extensive potential for terrestrial and aerospace applications, including rockets and hypersonic systems.”
Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Alan Estevez was quoted as saying that “Technological advancements that allow technologies like semiconductors and engines to operate faster, more efficiently, longer, and in more severe conditions can be game changers in both the commercial and military context.”
Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Alan Estevez sees a national security threat. Image: Handout
Then, on August 23, the BIS issued the following statement:
The US Commerce Department, through its Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), has issued a final rule adding seven Chinese space, aerospace, and related technology entities to the Entity List and severely restricting their access to commodities, software, and technologies subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). These seven entities have been added to the Entity List for activities contrary to US national security and foreign policy interests, specifically for acquiring and attempting to acquire US-origin items in support of the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) military modernization efforts. With this action, the Commerce Department will have approximately 600 Chinese entities on the Entity List – more than 110 of which have been added since the start of the Biden administration.”
What might once have seemed like a precisely targeted rifle shot approach to sanctioning China now looks like a shotgun blast.
A cynic might wonder when the US government will pressure New Zealand to curtail exports of dairy products so that Chinese youngsters don’t grow up to be big strong soldiers. The serious question is, how and when will China retaliate?
Follow this writer on Twitter: @ScottFo83517667
|
