SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (1375271)9/26/2022 5:39:27 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Brumar89

  Read Replies (1) of 1577696
 
Inode,
Yes, that would definitely be better. At the very least, it kills the corruption component.
Right, but in the end it doesn't matter. There's always going to be the "wink-and-a-nudge" factor that campaign finance laws cannot cover.

And besides, this alliance between Zuck and left-leaning election officials is a far cry from the "OMG STOLEN ELECTION WE NEED TO DECLARE TRUMP DA WINNER NOW NOW NOW!!!" talk that the Q Continuum is promoting.

Because no matter what, there were no votes that were altered as a result of what Zuck did. Nor were there any fake ballots, or corrupt vote counters, or dumped ballots, that resulted from Zuck's shenanigans.

All that happened is that maybe a few more apathetic voters on the left showed up to the polls relative to the apathetic voters on the right.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News