Tenchu's Thoughts: Cui bono - Who Benefits?
NATO Believes Nord Stream Gas Leak in Baltic Sea Gas Is Result of Sabotage (newsweek.com)
The Internets and the media is abuzz with the question of "whodunit."
Many think RuZZia did it, even though RuZZia didn't need to since they already control the flow of gas into Europe. And PooTin already declared that the gas will stop flowing until NATO stops helping Ukraine.
Some think America or NATO did it. This theory holds some water among those who believe NATO wants the war in Ukraine to continue.
The way to logically answer this question is to first ask ourselves the following:
#1 - Cui bono - Who Benefits?
Who really benefits from this sabotage?
Is it RuZZia? After all, they are exploiting Europe's dependency on the Nord Stream pipelines in order to convince them to stop helping Ukraine. Hence the reason why RuZZia cut off the supply of natural gas in the first place.
But if that's the case, why would they even bother with the sabotage? It serves them no practical purpose, other than to finalize the cut-off of supply and forever take it out of consideration.
But such a move would likely backfire, since by removing that option from the table, NATO will now have no other choice but to continue supporting Ukraine.
So it's likely NOT RuZZia who benefits.
How about NATO? Why would they want to remove the reactivation of the Nord Stream pipeline from consideration? Wouldn't that exacerbate an already precarious position with regard to natural gas prices?
Maybe it's because there are some members of NATO that are getting skittish about the coming winter. Already there are protests within some European countries, including Belgium:
Thousands rally in Belgium to protest high energy prices (yahoo.com)
Hence by blowing up the pipeline, NATO could defang the PooTin cucks and consolidate continued support for Ukraine.
It's certainly something a bunch of warmongers WOULD do, assuming NATO really is full of "warmongers."
So in response to "Cui bono?" I would say that NATO ultimately benefits.
#2 - Did the perp act rationally?
But answering the question "Cui bono?" isn't enough, because acts like these are often committed by people who act irrationally.
Look at PooTin's war of choice, for example. He certainly didn't act rationally in starting the war, he certainly didn't act rationally in continuing the conflict after the assault on Kyiv failed, and he most definitely didn't act rationally when he announced "mobilization" and threatened to use nukes.
So let's look at NATO first. Let's assume that they would benefit from the pipeline sabotage. But would that be a rational move to make?
Probably not, because if it was proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that NATO did it, the negative consequences would be tremendous.
The PooTin cucks would have a field day.
China would be proven right in accusing NATO of wanting to perpetuate the war in Ukraine.
A LOT more anti-war protests would break out in Europe.
And ultimately the steady flow of supplies into Ukraine would be at risk, as well as Ukraine's chances of victory over PooTin's war of choice.
Given NATO's modus operandi, which is characterized by aversion to risk, I don't believe they would act this recklessly.
Now let's look at RuZZia. It's already obvious that they are not acting rationally.
By any measure whatsoever, PooTin is desperate, and he is taking on additional risks to his own grip on power just to stop Ukraine's momentum.
Let's not forget that RuZZia has a very long record of creating fake news, executing false flag operations, and generally doing the most comically unbelievable things like holding referen-dumbs in occupied territory.
Even their "discoveries" of nAzIs in Ukraine were laughably stupid:
Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board - Msg: 33845480 (siliconinvestor.com)
So how would that relate to the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines?
Well, RuZZia is still of the opinion that Europe will crumble without RuZZian natural gas. "wInTeR iS cOmInG," taunt the PooTin cucks.
One of those cucks even livestreamed a gas stove running 24/7 before the stream was shut down:
Russian gas burning live stream shut down — RT Games & Culture
And RuZZia would have more to gain if the world believed NATO sabotaged the pipeline than NATO would gain if the world believed RuZZia did it.
I don't think the world (excluding Axis of Evil 2.0) is going to believe NATO was responsible, but RuZZia is probably hoping for it.
Tenchu's Conclusion - RuZZia Did It
It is now my belief that RuZZia sabotaged the pipelines, even though they didn't need to, and even though they would only end up hurting themselves.
And even though NATO would ultimately benefit from such sabotage, I don't think anyone in NATO has the balls to do something like this, especially not our senile leader of the free world, Brandon.
bUt bUt tEnChU wHaTaBoUt ...
Yes yes, I know, Brandon once claimed that, if RuZZia attacked Ukraine, he would bring the Nord Stream 2 pipeline to an end:
But Brandon was never specific as to how he would do that.
One could assume that sabotage was exactly what he meant.
But one could also assume that he would use diplomatic means to shut down Nord Stream 2.
Finally, one could assume that Brandon didn't know WTF he was talking about.
All three possibilities are equally likely. No one can't conclude anything from that video clip alone.
Of course, that's not stopping the Kremlin and the PooTin cucks from posting that clip over and over again all over the Internet.
You know what that means. When the Kremlin feels the need to repeat something over and over again, chances are it's a lie.
Tenchusatsu |
