SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (768863)10/2/2022 11:42:43 AM
From: TimF1 Recommendation

Recommended By
greenspirit

  Read Replies (1) of 794169
 
And if Ukraine was part of NATO there would be non-nuclear missiles in Ukraine, not nuclear ones, it wouldn't make much sense to put them that close to what would be the front line.

I'm not calling for membership, just going back to the comparison of the situations between Cuba and Ukraine. Cuba had nuclear missiles put in place, and at a time when that represented a significant increase in the nuclear threat to the US (much more so than it would today, let alone at the peak ICBM levels).

Ukraine doesn't have any nuclear weapons, got rid of there's in exchange for a Russian promise to essentially leave them alone (respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity (with its borders including Crimea) and a pledge to not even use economic coercion against Ukraine). If NATO membership for Ukraine actually was a serious prospect, or even had already happened, it would not represent anywhere near the increase in threat that nukes in Cuba where.

And NATO membership for Ukraine has been a dead idea since at least 2014, and before that Ukraine didn't want it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext