SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: didjuneau who wrote (769319)10/11/2022 4:02:50 AM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations

Recommended By
3bar
didjuneau

  Read Replies (4) of 793623
 
They were pretty good predictions.

But Z and his USA cronies persevered so Russia annexed Luhansk, Donetsk and a lot more besides instead of just getting them independence.

Germany still looks likely to go military.

Euroserfs getting cold is a done deal along with recession trending depression.

France citizens agitating to dump NATO = preemptive surrender = sensible.

China on track to acquire Russia or at least most of it, but maybe all by buying it at bargain basement price. They already got a hefty gas price cut. And surely will offer to build a lot more pipelines.

Elon copy/pasted my settlement recommendation. And it's looking like a likely outcome.

I expect 10 or 20 escalatory atomic bombs to make Yanks/Eurostan get serious. Full scale deflection to MAD is a hazard but when Americans realise everywhere including downtown Peoria is included the gung ho shoot 'em up made for TV hubris will get a second thought.

In the global game of "chicken" I watched Vladimir bow to the monument to bygone heroes of Russian defence and throw the steering wheel out the window. Gulp!!!

He stood there much much longer than the normal peremptory pro-forma recognition that politicians give when feeling obliged to lay a wreath.

No doubt very few watched that and if they did, they didn't see what was going on.

The latest fusillade hopefully demonstrated that Russia won't just surrender and die and that USA better figure it out.

The bomb that killed that lady in Moscow changed the nature of the conflict. It made polonium 210 in drinking water a valid technique of murder. Along with novichok.

I always thought those murders in England were general warnings. Doorknobs, undies, tea = all fair game.

Litres of polonium 210 can be anywhere and not amenable to detection as the radioactive action is very short range. USA declaring war on Russia doesn't mean they get to decide what weapons are used.

USA used atomic bombs on Japan. That had never been done before. I don't see why Russians can't use their own innovative techniques. Polonium 210 has never been used before either.

Think of it as a personal nanoscale atomic bomb with a few centimetres blast range.

"Hey that's unsporting" is not a sensible response.

I recommend voting and free enterprise trading, not obliteration of millions or billions of people.

It's not even a difficult solution.

In bygone centuries genocidal wars were a reasonable and essential Malthusian resolution of overpopulation. That's not the situation now other than in some African countries maybe.

Neither Russia nor Ukraine have surplus people. Nor does Eurostan nor USA, nor China, nor a lot of other countries.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext