| | | Ref. Bar-Tailed Godwit-Migratory birds.
Dr. Robert Malone. Full article here. rwmalonemd.substack.com
"Well Being: Dangers of 5G"
Regarding wildlife and the environment. I found this portion of the paper particularly disturbing (note the large number of cited peer reviewed publications - please refer to the publication for the specific numbered references):
… “neither the FCC nor the ICNIRP take into consideration effects of this radiation on wildlife.
The constant movement of most wildlife species in and out of varying artificial EMF can result in high exposures near communication structures, especially for flying species such as birds and insects. There is a substantial amount of scientific literature on the disrupting effects of RFR on wildlife (e.g., [190–206]).
Many nonhuman species use Earth’s geomagnetic fields for activities such as orientation and seasonal migration, food finding, mating, nest and den building [190]. For example, migratory bird species [191, 192], honeybees [193], bats [194], fsh [195–197], and numerous other species sense Earth’s magnetic fields with specialized sensory receptors.
Mechanisms likely involved in magneto-reception include magnetic induction of weak electric signals in specialized sensory receptors [198], magneto-mechanical interactions with the iron-based crystal magnetite [194], and/or free-radical interactions with cryptochrome photoreceptors [191, 192]. Each of these sensing processes shows extreme sensitivity to low intensity changes in electromagnetic fields. For a fuller description of the mechanisms by which non-human species use magneto-reception to perform essential life activities see Levitt et al. [190].
Te following studies represent a few of the many examples of the disrupting effects of low-level exposures to RF-EMF on magneto-reception and the natural behavior of wildlife. Oscillating magnetic fields have been reported to disrupt the ability of migratory birds to orient and navigate in Earth’s geomagnetic field
Precautionary Measures Recommended by the International EMF Scientist Appeal
1) Priority should be given to protect children and pregnant women
2) Guidelines and regulatory standards should be strengthened
3) Manufacturers should be encouraged to develop safer technologies
4) The public should be fully informed about the potential health risks from electromagnetic energy and taught harm reduction strategies
5) Medical professionals need to be educated about the biological effects of electromagnetic energy and be provided training on treatment of patients with electromagnetic sensitivity
6) Governments need to fund training and research on electromagnetic fields and health that is independent of industry
7) The media should disclose experts’ financial relationships with industry when citing their opinions regarding health and safety aspects of EMF emitting technologies
8) Radiation-free areas need to be established, especially for individuals with EHS
In so many words, a careful reading of the above recommendations suggest that regulatory capture has indeed occurred and that capture includes corporate media. Strong words. Very similar to the pervasive pattern of regulatory and corporate media capture observed and documented during the COVID crisis. |
|
