| | | Inode, Because it was a back room deal, not an arms-length negotiation. Back-room deals happen all the time. There's even a song about it from the Broadway show Hamilton, called "The Room Where It Happens." (Several political books even copied that title.)
BFD.
That being said, we do know that mismatches under the old arrangement (i.e., visual inspection by experienced workers in the Elections offices) yielded a 6.4% rejection rate. And after the modified rule, comparing with any signature on file in the office, the rejection rate dropped to 0.3%. So, you had a pretty massive reduction in rejections. On the surface, I think that's OK. Personally my signature changes all the time. I'm not sure my signature would pass inspection under the old rules.
By the way, I have many friends in health care, including a lot of doctors. And doctors are notorious for having signatures that look like they were scratched by chickens with ADHD.
These are not how the election was stolen in 2020. These are examples of the types of activities that were used in every swing state to gain a tactical advantage without considering the plight of the voters. OK, but I asked you for evidence showing that 2020 was "stolen."
You responded by giving me "examples" of unfairness.
Still no direct evidence proving that 2020 was "stolen."
But you're filling in the gaps with huge leaps in "logic" that could only make sense within the Q Continuum.
Tenchusatsu |
|
