SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (1380132)11/15/2022 1:53:39 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) of 1579715
 
If you can’t provide security in California that meets MY requirements I don’t want you to do it.
I never suggested California had anything to do with stealing the election in 2020. And I wouldn't. The central areas where theft occurred were Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, and potentially Arizona & Nevada.

Most other states have more secure systems and/or lack the will to steal elections.

But notably, these are swing states where the vote really matters.

(There was also a serious effort to steal the election in Texas, but it was limited and met with serious opposition in the courts).

You can call this unfair, but to call it a "steal" makes you an election denier.
I am absolutely an election denier. I know what is necessary to detect and prevent theft & fraud and our elections aren't cutting it. Not even close. And I know what a scam looks like.

I'm an election denier because I know what I'm talking about.

The entire point of the theft was to steal the election without anyone knowing they did it. I've explained to you there were at least a half dozen clear vectors of attack, all of which you should be able to discern when they're pointed out to you.

Sorry, it just isn't your thing. You've got Newsomnia.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext