SI Message Filtering - Pros and Cons Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Message Filtering - Pros and Cons

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SI Brad who wrote (67)	2/11/1998 11:10:00 PM
From: loafy loaf	Read Replies (1) of 263

Brad, The note from Jim H refers to one person as being the problem in the Fonar thread, and everyone there knows whom he's blaming. The note is an attack on her. The same fellow posted notes in this thread alluding to her in a perjorative way. You posted that you had suspended both sides, but you left some of one side to continue to post negative remarks about one person, and you've set it so she can't respond. In my view, she has been attacked constantly in that one thread, and I believe that the offending posts belong to her attackers. Since Jim H has been reading this thread and the Fonar thread, his post in the Fonar thread is simply an excuse to knock one person. You posted only yesterday in that thread that you'd suspended people for engaging in just such behavior, so I'd suggest it would be consistent that Jim be suspended for breaking the same rule. I submit that ideas should be attackable but not people. I think that's a fairly clear concept and that he broke that rule by his post. He was calling names. My own post addressed what he did in that post, and did not personally attack him, nor call him names. Do you agree with that distinction? LOAF

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next