2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 386.01

+1.6%

Nov 12 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

ggersh

To: ggersh who wrote (194048)	11/24/2022 5:21:23 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 217734

Today, some views by the media. My conclusion, Nato needs to send fairly large order of battle directly into Ukraine, or even into Russia from other fronts, else lose narrative / escalation stepping, and deal with the fallout Perhaps explaining why some Pentagon types calling for negotiations Pro-Ukraine MSM view Pro-Ukraine vlogger view not looking good, and evacuation of Kiev happening by those who are able Pro-Russia vlogger view ... Ukraine lost capability / capacity to redeploy / supply troops due to total destruction of power infrastructure post the first / earlier probing effort, and now post-rebuild effort, leaving Ukraine with just one option, a big charge into Russian fortifications from current positions and by current orders of battle Need to recall coal / diesel locomotives assuming fuel(s) available and machines work, and fast Would say situation might go super-critical as the grounds harden by winter If actually so, either Nato command had no idea how to fight conventional big-arrow war against a peer, or Nato deliberately sacrificed Ukraine

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next