Thanks for saving me writing that. Bung statistics that mislead are very annoying.
Data that might show something would be total miscarriages by month and year, and along with that, covid vaxx given each month. Also, covid deaths each month.
Epidemiologists have been almost useless during the covid pandemic. They managed to figure out that old people are at greater risk than young people, but not much more. Pitiful.
There have been so many millions killed that all variables could have been monitored.
There is still not even good information on the utility of horse-ivermectin as an early treatment. The research designed to fail was no help. Hardly anything on zinc levels at diagnosis and death. Same for vitamin D, A and C. And other things.
Right now, excess mortality is the big issue. But there's no epidemiology on that either. There are just "Just So" stories about deferred mortality and other bullshit. No data. Unless proven otherwise, I'll assume that the excess mortality is due to being vaxxed with ACE2-destroying spike proteins and other immune system ruination. They have to prove that is NOT the cause. I don't have to prove it is.
Hi Maurice,
I always really enjoy reading your posts, and think you post some very insightful things. So I'm curious about the first paragraph you wrote above and hope you can further explain what you mean. While I certainly agree that there could be more useful data, I don't think I agree with the "bung statistics that mislead" characterization of that particular graph.
Maybe I'm missing something, and if so, I'm hoping you can fill me in on what that is. The graph is displaying an absolute number, not a ratio of total vaccinations given. So I don't really see where Jacob's point about children has any relevance? They're not factored into those past stats, and they're not factored into 2021-2022 stats either. Those stats are obviously relevant only to pregnant women. Now, there is an argument that more pregnant women were getting vaccinated than in previous years, but that is a pretty dubious argument to explain away the dramatic rise seen as anything other than the Covid vaccines, as that was the obvious difference in those years. We also need to take into consideration that most pregnant women were reluctant (and wisely so) to take the Covid vaccines during their pregnancy- I believe only about 1 in 5 did. So these numbers could be much more dramatic if more pregnant women had taken the vaccines.
If we further contrast this to flu vaccination, which I believe was very common for pregnant women to take in those prior years (invalidating Jacob's assertion that women of child-bearing age got very few vaccinations), I suspect the kind of more interesting and informative data you yearn for would exhibit an order of magnitude difference in the per rate incidence. Jacob tried using almost the same faulty reasoning when I showed the general VAERS data that showed adverse events from these vaccines had surpassed those of all other vaccines combined over the past 30-40 years (since they started keeping these stats). His reasoning was that we've never seen such a mass vaccination in our history before, so the graph was misleading. Only problem was that he once again forgot about the flu vaccine, which I pointed out to him, and even pulled stats from CDC's own website showing total vaccinations over the history vs. the covid years, and accounting for that, the incidence rate for these vaccines was still >10x more than that for all other vaccines combined. He's chosen to conveniently forget that and try a similar specious argument here, unless there's something I'm missing that you see?
In any event, I think the graph makes a clear case for alarm and concern, and something to be investigated, not pushed aside and dismissed as Jacob is wont to do for anything that shows reason for concern regarding the Covid vaccines. Strange how he doesn't apply that same skepticism or take the effort to poke holes into anything that is pro-vaccine, such as their ability to prevent transmission, even after I pointed out to him early on that the vaccine manufacturers themselves never made that claim, which could be seen in their own documentation.
I do fully agree with the other sentiments you expressed. |
