SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jpdunwell who wrote (773727)12/14/2022 12:03:21 AM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations

Recommended By
3bar
Jacob Snyder

  Read Replies (1) of 793622
 
Not really - we're now actually both making the same point that the graph is more likely understating the severity of the problem, rather than overstating it. To me, that graph didn't give useful information about the severity of the miscarriage problem. It didn't even show that miscarriages are worse with the vaxx than normal. I guess 5% increase in miscarriages for women who got vaxxed in the first 3 months of pregnancy and the prior month. If the vaxx gets through the placenta, I raise that to 10% extra mortality with vaxx than without.

What's needed is a count of women vaxxed in the first 3 months of pregnancy and their outcomes compared with those who were not. Should be super easy data to collect. Maternal obesity should also be counted along with the other risk factors such as zinc level, vitamin D level, HbA1c level, whether they got covid during their pregnancy and when and now bad it was.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News