Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

garrettjax

Maple MAGA

To: Sdgla who wrote (773794)	12/14/2022 4:33:37 AM
From: golfer72	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 793656

I've commented on this SC case before. The key is that it doesnt necessarily have to show fraud in the election its aimed at the elected officials that refused to even consider and investigate charges of fraud before they certified the election. Thats a whole different animal than actually having to show evidence and proof of a stolen election. Its really more of a procedural violation and violating oaths of office. If this fails the party really is over for this country

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next