SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 159.42-1.2%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ramsey Su who wrote (8451)2/12/1998 10:29:00 AM
From: bananawind  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Ramsey,

Your comments about Q-phone demand imply that price is a large factor.

The biggest mistake, (my opinion), is the Q phone. I think the co clearly overestimated demand, especially in Korea. Sounds like they are moving production capability to the lower lines which are still in high demand.

In one of his posts Gregg Powers recently stated that this (price sensitivity) is currently not a major factor in Q demand. He said the falloff domestically was due to the slowness of the PCS buildout in some areas, which leads to spotty coverage. This in turn leads to either a dual-mode choice, a non-cdma choice, or a non-subscriber.

I can confirm that this is the case in the state of Florida, where Primeco has a much larger footprint than Sprint, but both are far from having statewide coverage. In my own neighborhood four PCS operators have been held up for seven months by a county moratorium on towers. I've heard this is going on all over the country. Although the Communications Act says local govs can't ban the towers, it gives them enough room to allow local politcos to make some hay with the NIMBY crowd and delay things for quite a while.

IMO, none of this constitutes making a "mistake" with the Q-phone, and having Hansol cancel their Q-phone order can hardly be attributed to poor management. -JLF
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext