| Taiwan’s Social Safety Net Is the Street Market In 3 years here, in a city bigger and poorer than St. Louis, I have never once seen a homeless person.
 Tuesday, August 16, 2016
 Peter St. Onge
 
 Free-marketers are often ridiculed for suggesting the welfare state  can be substantially replaced by free enterprise: that we’re smoking  funny weed to even suggest that able-bodied adults would be better off  with more invigorating freedom instead of a debilitating dole.
 
 The Case of Taiwan
 
 Well, we have a fantastic case study in exactly this: Taiwan. With a  GDP per capita about half US levels -- between Spain and Portugal --  Taiwan has a tiny welfare state paired with regulations that are both  light and lightly enforced.
 
 Result? An explosion in commerce, and apparently near-zero  homelessness. Walk anywhere in a Taiwanese city and the streets are  alive, all day and all night, with a rotating cast of pop-up businesses  that employ mainly low-skill labor while making life a joy for  consumers.
 
 o give a flavor, take one street near my university, Wenhua St. in  Taichung. Starting around 5am, farmers drive in and spread out their  produce on folding tables along the street. Shoppers are diverse:  elderly who can walk instead of driving out to a megastore, mothers with  kids, fathers cooking up breakfast.
 
 Around 7am the farmers pack up and move the breakfast joints,  unloading folding tables and stacking chairs off their pickup trucks.  Sandwich places, noodle shops, omelettes and full English breakfast.  These go until a bit past noon, when they fold up everything on their  trucks and out come the night crew: a different set of restaurants  selling fried chicken or dumplings, vendors selling clothes, watches,  kids’ toys. As the night wears on the beer joints open, selling hot soup  and a cold beer. Families, teens, and singles throng the streets until  3am, when the street cleaners come out in preparation for the farmers  coming at 5.
 
 So hundreds of jobs, small rivers of entrepreneurial income all  running off one little street. Each patch of street is recycled 3 or  more times a day according to what customers want. And none of it would  be legal in most US cities.
 
 The Beauty of Laissez-faire
 
 Three interesting results come out of this laissez-faire approach to  small commerce. First, streets in Taiwan are full of shoppers all day  and all night. There are none of those dangerous urban deserts that  abound in American cities like DC and New York. You can safely roam  around at 3am any day of the week, and find tons of pop-up bars or  restaurants, packed with laughing people enjoying the night.
 
 Second, because laissez-faire allows a robust market to develop,  street food in Taiwan is safe, delicious, and ridiculously cheap. We pay  between $1.50 and $2 for a full meal, in a country where overall costs  are half the US level. So, adjusting for price levels, we pay $3 to $4  for what would cost us easily 3-5 times that in the US. As a result, my  family doesn’t eat out once a week like back in the States; we eat out 2  or 3 times a day.
 
 Why so cheap? Because the market is substantially left to  self-regulate: if a vendor sells bad or dirty food, word spreads and  they’re out of business. Other vendors, indeed, enforce this since the  reputation of the whole street is at risk. The result is that vendors  scrupulously clean their equipment every day; indeed there are services  that go around cleaning your food-stall on hire. It’s like nested  deregulation: an unregulated service provided to an unregulated service  that is, ultimately, “policed” by customers themselves.
 
 From my perspective as a customer, the end result is fantastic:  clean, delicious food that we can afford to eat every single day of the  month. By the way, that is apparently what most Taiwanese now do: it’s  standard for people to never cook in, but rather to just pick up $2  meals every night for the family, only cooking for special occasions or  for a midnight snack.
 
 Third, and possibly most important, is the impact on jobs and  self-sufficiency. A Taiwanese friend announced he’d lost his job, and  his friends’ first question was: what kind of shop will you open during  your job-hunt? Since it’s so easy to start a pocket-business, there’s an  entire industry that caters to them. You can lose your job, take the  bus, rent a food stand for a month, pay $50 to slap on some signage,  have it delivered to some high-traffic spot and get cranking that night  on fried twinkies, sausage-buns, whatever you think people want to eat.  So sling sausages by night, keep looking for work in the daytime, and  when you find a job just take the stand back for your deposit.
 
 Freedom and opportunity: that is what underpins true welfare and  security. The results are striking: in 3 years here, in a city bigger  and poorer than St. Louis, I have never once seen a homeless person. The  closest I've seen is an elderly lady who grows orchids and sells them  out of a bag.
 
 So choose one: job-killing regulations and a welfare state, or reduce burdens on small business and set the people free.
 
 fee.org
 |