Looks like you lied. Release Pelosi’s Tax Returns
The Trump tax return release sets a precedent.
spectator.org
Talk about a double standard.
Talk about abuse of power.
Again.
On Friday, Dec. 30, the Democrats running the House Ways and Means Committee are releasing former President Donald Trump’s taxes.
Which is to say, they are launching one of the biggest — if not the biggest — invasion of privacy in the history of the U.S. Congress.
But unwittingly (as always) the Democrats are clueless about a key problem they have created for themselves. In a word? Precedent.
Once the barn door of releasing the private tax returns of a former government official has been opened, the demand will — and should — be on to release the tax returns of other government officials past and present — to teach the lesson that this should never happen again — to anyone.
The first place to start with this precedent would be with Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi has saidthe following on the subject: “When and if I decide to run for president, I will most certainly release my tax returns.”
Got that? Only if she runs for president. As if. She is Speaker of the House, the third in line to the presidency, and when Republicans take charge of the House on Jan. 3, she will still be there as the senior Democrat in the House, and, for that matter, a senior member of the entire House.
Breitbart has noted this of her refusal to release her tax returns in a story that ran in July 2020:
Pelosi’s refusal to release her own tax returns comes as federal loan data released by the Trump administration earlier this week shows companies connected to her husband received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Paycheck Protection Program.
In other words this is the old liberal double standard in play: Rules for thee and different rules for me. In this case that means one set of rules for President Trump — and a second, quite different set of rules for Nancy Pelosi.
But thanks to the precedent being set by releasing the Trump returns, it is time to change the rules and make them the same for everybody. So if the Trump returns are to be released, the demand should go up to require Pelosi to reveal hers.
Also on the precedent list? That should be the outgoing chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Congressman Richard Neal (D-Mass.) and his 24 Democrat committee colleagues who voted to invade Trump’s privacy by releasing his returns. And yes — no double standards. So the Republican Committee Members should be required to do this as well.
The larger point here in the invasion of President Trump’s privacy is that, yet again, the Swamp that is Washington D.C. has a serious double standard problem in dealing with Trump (and other Republicans), combined with repeated abuses of power by those in power in the Biden Justice Department, the FBI, and elsewhere in the bureaucracy — and media — as well.
Over there at Conservative Brief is this headline:
Paul Sperry Unpacks The Trump-Hillary Double Standard
The article, by Martin Walsh, details ace reporter Paul Sperry’s detailed analysis of the government’s treatment of Hillary Clinton versus that of Donald Trump. Walsh begins by saying this, with bold print for emphasis supplied:
Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch obtained evidence that a computer contractor working under the direction of Hillary Clinton’s legal team destroyed subpoenaed records that the former secretary of state stored on a private email server she originally kept at her New York home, and then lied to investigators about it. Yet no charges were brought against Clinton, her lawyers, or her paid consultant.
The leniency accorded to Clinton contrasts with recent moves by Attorney General Merrick Garland to aggressively investigate former President Trump and his lawyers for allegedly obstructing investigators’ efforts to locate subpoenaed records at his Florida home. Legal experts say the apparent double standard may provide a useful defense for Trump and his legal team. |
