Apple Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.

AAPL 270.82

-1.0%

Dec 22 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Alomex who wrote (8441)	2/12/1998 2:58:00 PM
From: Dirk Dawson	Read Replies (2) of 213177

Alomex, I've been working on Macs regularly since the introduction of the PowerMacs and have installed and studied each new release of OS versions and updates since then. At the initial introduction of the PPC machines, I will agree that there was a tremendous amount of legacy code in the OS running slowly in emulation. I also agree that Apple devoted an unfortunate number of engineering resources to Copland which probably detracted from bringing the OS code fully-PPC-native. (This is not a total loss, though, as much of the Copland code seems to be cropping up in recent OS releases.) However, I must point out that in every incremental update/upgrade to the OS Apple has included more and more native PPC code. It's still not fully native, but is moving fairly quickly in that direction. Native OS code was not abandoned, in search of Copland, just hampered a bit. Also keep in mind that the transition to a completely different chip architecture is not achieved simply by pressing a button. If it were, this would be a very different thread (and world!). Dirk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next