SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Ben Smith
Stock Puppy
To: Stock Puppy who wrote (776149)1/22/2023 9:18:25 PM
From: skinowski2 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) of 793964
 
The argument would be that it diminishes symptoms.
Maybe, but the counterargument would be that the impact of the vaxx on the young is far smaller - and the incidence of problems is far greater, at 3% of young males having damage to the heart muscle, as evidenced by an elevation of cardiac enzymes.

If a young person for some reason must get vaccinated — use Novavax. Except that the stupid bums allow it for kids 12 and older for primary 2 vaccinations — but for boosters, NO. Only for kids 18 and over.

Kids under 18, for boosters have to go back to mRNA.

WHY - no idea. Probably, stupid kooks simply did not include them in the study.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News