SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maple MAGA who wrote (1390224)2/6/2023 6:34:58 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 1571813
 
Joachim, there are limits to the peer review process. No doubt the scientific community has overrepresented the value of peer review, not to mention the value of all the studies that they put forth on a daily basis.

It says a lot when you are measured not by the quality of the work you have done, but by the quantity. A researcher has a vested interest in getting his or her name attached to as many peer-reviewed studies as possible.

But if we eliminated the peer-review process, what is to replace it? How can we tell the difference between reputable research and the works of a self-proclaimed "scientist" working for the Q Continuum?

At least there is a process involved with peer review. What process is there when you just ask tEh iNtErNeTs to review your work? Do you measure the quality of a study by how many "likes" it got on Trooth Social?

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News