SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stock Puppy who wrote (777704)2/12/2023 3:36:13 PM
From: skinowski1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Stock Puppy

  Read Replies (2) of 794001
 
I suggested a quick idea off the top of my head - which could justify further investigation.

I think it would make sense to test masks used for different pre-determined periods of time. If there are no significant accumulations of bacteria at 3 hours - but they increase sharply after 4, that’s useful information. Recommend changing masks every 4 hours.

Masks protecting against a respiratory virus like CoViD is in itself a strange game. Remember reading a Scandinavian study that showed that masks made no difference. Others argue that good masks, properly worn should make a difference. In real life, very few people do that. I did see it, on occasion.

We never sunk to the abysmal depths of killing innocent animals… but much of the guidance we received was was not based on any real knowledge.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News