2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 386.01

+1.6%

4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

marcher

To: maceng2 who wrote (196299)	2/14/2023 4:54:52 AM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation of 217712

Addendum: From Dr Fisher. "I believe, however, that there is such a thing as an UNscientific method, and that, rather like Lewis Carroll’s conception of an UNbirthday in Alice in Wonderland, it is much more common than the real thing. The rules for applying the unscientific method to a problem are simple: ~ Know what answer you are looking for. ~ Look for evidence and arguments to support your answer. ~ Avoid or ignore evidence and arguments that do not support your answer. ~ Deride those who disagree with you. It’s that simple. And it is much easier to use than any real scientific method. Maybe that’s why so many people use it." Some Examples spring to mind from Dr Fishers analysis: (a) JFK. He was obviously shot from the front, not the rear. Do the ballistic experts who developed the "magic bullet theory" consider this basic piece of evidence? Did they deliberately ignore?? (b) 911. We knew the "answer" within minutes, and just look at what's been found out since. (c) Covid19. Again, we knew the "answer" within the first "News" broadcast or two. The "conclusion" stunk to high heaven since the get go.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next