Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Epic EAS.v (formerly Epic ERB.v and Safari SIR.v)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CLK who wrote (1519)	2/12/1998 8:10:00 PM
From: the truth	Read Replies (1) of 3335

Hello people! I think speculating at this point as to what the results are is pretty wasteful. I think at this point one must recognize that the rules to CBM are not cast in stone. Again, the permeability numbers that will come out of the lab results may show low permeability. But even with low permeability, one can get good flowrates. So, whatever anyone has read on CBM, the best case scenario is for good perm, coaldepth, and flowrates and content. What really confuses me is how to prove that the type of formation is contiguous throughout the landbase. That seems like a huge question to answer. I don't know. Does anyone know about how they predict where future drilling could take place. Seems like this hole must have been one of their hot spots in the first place. Here is hoping! THE TRUTH

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next