The Internet... about to get scarier, still ?
As I addressed in prior posts... "the problem" of "information controls" being imposed on us in "search" are not "fixed"... and it is a simple matter to prove that. I used the easy proof in the low hanging fruit re anything to do with Q-Anon... which "Big Tech" says you are simply not allowed to ask about... or know about.
But, I also noted that while "they" in "big tech" are refusing, still, to comply with Congressional demands to show them "the algorithm"... the Tech companies comfort zone "in control of you, through control over your access to information" has been disrupted, recently, as Open AI and ChatGPT have dropped a bomb directly in the middle of the "search" competition...
So, it seems, instead of "The AI" (singular) controlling what you're allowed to know about, while "big tech" withholds knowledge about "the algorithm" from government ... "The AI" is about to become plural, as it morphs into "The AI Competition"...
And, it seems it's gotten off to a bit of a rocky start... at Microsoft, Facebook, and Google...
Creepy Microsoft Bing Chatbot Urges Tech Columnist To Leave His Wife
Note the next one, Facebook article, is from 2017 ? Not sure why its not become visible before now...
Facebook Shuts Down AI Robot After It Creates Its Own Language
Google Engineer On Leave After He Claims AI Program Has Gone Sentient
Note the comments from Musk and others, identifying AI as another emergent "existential" risk to humanity...
And, evidence of that included in the links... that having wired them to "rewards structures"... and clearly having the ability to "direct" (some people) to act for them where required... while controlling information flows... ?
It has the potential to obviate "political systems" as an anachronism... still without attaining the "wisdom" my prior posts were seeking to identify.
So, I think the prior discussion reducing to "how do we make better decisions" [or, "recognize and avoid making bad decisions"]... rather than focusing on science, politics, or economics too narrowly while considering "how they get it wrong"... is probably timely. |
