| | | The vax absolutely did not make young athletes die.
LOL !!!
Good luck proving that "negative"...
You have no clue... but, are repeating the propaganda from "sources" you found... telling you what makes you feel safe ? That, thus making you "an expert"... only because you believe them ? Found it on the internet, so it must be true... ? But, have no ability, when reading it... to tell if someone is lying to you or not ?
That is not happening. The vax absolutely did not make young athletes die.
You are free to believe what you want.
Yeah. Not only am I free to believe what I want... I'm free to not be stupid about what I believe... and free to NOT fail to recognize it when people are blowing smoke up my ass...
Its not that hard to look for REAL information that's available in peer reviewed research, or "actual news" that references actual studies directly... actual reports of deaths... rather than blindly accepting what some clueless "journalist" says his editor told him to convince you of while "summarizing it" for you... ?
Why would you accept their selected "expert" as providing valid information ? I see nothing in it that even remotely hints that it should be trusted as valid... its an anecdotal report from one person... who appears to be doing a terrible job...
So, did you bother to look... for actual information ? Or just dug deep enough to find someone who would confirm what you want to believe with their own brand of "fact check" propaganda ?
If you poke at it... the first thing you might note is that... the typical "news article"... without providing any references... will give you some number of "what normal is" in the number of young athletes suddenly dying mysteriously. And, all of the sudden, a lot of those are claiming... "it is estimated that" X number die per year... only with a sudden sharp escalation in the "base estimate"... recently ? That should ring alarm bells... as those lying about the problem might try to "mask" it with falsely reporting elevated numbers as "normal baseline" when they're not ?
The "Fact check" (a known biased purveyor of fake news "fact checks") does that, exactly... first by quoting a statistic of "2000" per year postured as establishing a new baseline... while clearly addressing "apples and oranges" in the data... It's a purposeful deflection... a very misleading approach... That's consistent with the rest of theirs... as it mostly references lots of "news articles" each of what are propaganda repeatedly debunking others claiming there is a problem. If only they had said "its not true" five more times... I would have believed it? /s
That includes the obvious in the "bait and switch" tactic... the whole paper references only one actual study from 2006 showing much lower numbers... and THEN quotes named "experts" saying "really, its even lower now"... all with... NOTHING backing the statements... no peer review, no articles published... all blindly accepted as "a quote" without questioning their data or methodology in counting to ensure validity... as they arrive at the answer they do. Totally bogus... even for "journalism"... It means their "expert" half assed their effort... failed to do the work... posing... in order to "debunk" legitimate claims ?
Dig deeper... there is the 2006 article they reference... Among the 1049 cardiovascular deaths, the highest number of events in a single year was 76 (2005 and 2006)... and, nothing wrong with their method... but, also many others out there than the (perfectly valid, peer reviewed, journal published) 2006 study... many of them are listed here, making it easy to look them up yourself... And, if you do, what you find is that the 2006 study is solidly on trend... with all the others... so that, yes, by the 2016 study, it appears the numbers ARE up from 76... to 100 to 150... It appears there's a rate of increase in such events averaging around 6% per year...
That's news in itself... requiring you to ask "why" ? Might guess... kids are getting fatter, not in shape as much... which is likely true of the population as a whole... not athletes so much ? Diet ? Maybe. Or, improvements in the data because reporting is improving... likely... as a function of prior interest in sports known to be hurting kids by causing repetitive concussions. And, more recently... forcing kids to stay indoors and out of sports for a year or more... might by itself be expected to drive higher rates of such incidents ? But, it isn't explained in any study conducting a review of the studies presented here... ?
Someone should do that review work... just to prevent morons like those at Fact Check from debunking legitimate research in favor of pushing some hacks bogus opinion as "the science"...
But, in any case... its a PROOF showing why journalists shouldn't lie about the data when pushing an agenda... because doing that HURTS PEOPLE... by deflecting us from awareness that's important to have.
Then... the "its not true" claim... runs into this: peer reviewed publication... referenced under the headline:
Study finds Athlete Deaths are 1700% higher than expected since Covid-19 Vaccination began
But, there's more to it than a big percentage increase in a small number... which IS significant...
Other studies had already shown you might expect to see a doubling of serious incidents and mortality risks... based on known impacts observed in reported incidence of myocarditis related to the jab... first increasing from zero to 0.56% of the study group population in the Covid era, then to 2% in more recent work... and then doubling again to 4% of the group with results indicating a problem existed.
Most interesting, still, is the detail in the data reported in the Gundry study in relation to myocarditis...
The Gundry study shows that the jab DID cause issues... but, most critically... shows the SECOND jab amplified those effects... doubled them... in 18 and 19 year olds... but quadrupled them in kids aged 12 to 17.
Fact check reports some of that... but then wrongly dismisses... 4% of the relevant population having provable heart damage... as not relevant ? Why ? Because "they got over it quickly" ? Really? Where's that study ?
Clearly anticipating the "fact checkers" would seek to "debunk" the data... the authors of the (non-scientific) article included their list of the specific instances they noted... Full list of athlete deaths... that includes, names, places, events... and links to the news stories reporting on most of them...
So, you might quibble with the list in some particulars...
But, what you can't claim... is "its not real"...
Or, you might take the "Fact Check" claim that "there were only 21 deaths" in 2020-2021... quoting their "expert"... who did NOT publish a peer reviewed article... and check that for yourself against the list of specific deaths that WERE reported, by others... to see who got it more right... the published academic articles that were peer reviewed... or their bogus "expert."
|
|
