Da_cheifs vomitorium Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Da_cheifs vomitorium

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: POKERSAM who wrote (4229)	3/5/2023 11:13:34 AM
From: #Breeze	4 Recommendations of 7553

POKERSAM, On 1/23/23 you replied to my on Kirk's site as follow: "I am curious where "the bear" said 4100 would never be seen. If you are talking about me, perhaps, I should clear it up for you. I believe, of course, that 4100 will be seen again. I do not believe it will be until this bear market is over and I don't believe this bear will be over for many months to come. My target for the end of this bear remains 2200 as I stated in Jan. 2022. I also believe that my initial call for a bottom of 2200 may not be low enough. Once this bear market is complete, we will experience a tremendous bull market and then you can call me "the bull". lol Here is a question for you. How many bottoms for this correction would you estimate that you have called since 4818, the Jan. 2022 high? Up to this point those calls have all been wrong. Your latest is Oct. 13, 2022 @ 3491.58. We will see." You were adamant that 4100 would NOT be seen again until the bear market was over. Well since the 4195 was seen on Feb 2nd. I guess the bear market is over? What say you now. Since you've banned me from responding on your site. I responded here. And the bottom was on Oct 13. No one is perfect and I certainly don't claim to be. But I'm not stubborn and will adjust my counts as the price pattern demands. You've changed your bearish count several times. Elliott Wave is NOT a perfect TA tool. Corrective waves (especially wave fours) can turn complex and at times labeled in hindsight. As for your bearish wave count of a Y Wave. It's not correct. I've posted that a bearish count based on the price pattern off the ATH as an alternate count. Breeze.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next