2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 386.47

-0.2%

Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (197114)	3/10/2023 3:25:22 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) of 218198

What should occur to you at some point... Is that "the rules" governing economics... however you choose to think about them... and whatever (incomplete / erroneous) construct you create in an attempted description of "reality"... while trying to not just describe what is... but to use that model to dictate what should be... ? That effort cannot succeed in that degree it errs... adopts error... and seeks to impose error as a "rule" ? And, thus are we ruled. "No difference between communists and kings"... is really NOT a statement made about economics ? And, the propaganda used to sell error... as necessary ? The "greater good"... defined by who... and benefits who ? It's the philosophical approximation of "the solution to pollution is dilution". Even in approximation... any effort tasked in "making tails wag dogs" cannot begin to describe reality... as long as it ignores the most basic lessons our survival to date REQUIRE be learned... not only as an academic exercise... but for us to have any hope of continuing to survive ? That approach... to defining what "economics" you adhere to... as advocate for Team A or Team B... or some fiction in maintenance of "correct" balances between them... might not actually contain anything that's useful in relation to what you are looking for... ? See that often enough, right ? "No difference between"... "the two parties"... or, as I note, Team A and Team B in what they are advocating for us in "economics"... that is not really about economics at all ? Given "no difference" exists between them... why does that require you declare that "hard won awareness" as an "accomplishment"... requiring one must surrender to the fact of it ? There's no curiosity that extends beyond that... ? Given they are NOT different... or, not enough to matter ? Why are they the same ? And, thus... what is the alternative in NOT that ? But, no point in addressing NOT that... while failing in seeing "what is" clearly enough to navigate ? If the "difference" that matters is not in "economics"... or Team A vs Team B... then, what is it ?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next