SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts
COHR 181.67+2.4%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rarebird who wrote (15519)3/12/2023 11:21:26 PM
From: Kirk ©1 Recommendation

Recommended By
diegosan

  Read Replies (1) of 26711
 
Then you must have some major issues.
I don't see how one thing involves another unless one is a social bigot and hates gays and transgenders.
It has nothing to do with that.

Message 34220043

The simple answer is IF... BIG IF... the board of directors thought inclusion and diversity as well as "risk management" were IMPORTANT jobs then they would have had TWO people do the TWO jobs reporting to the CEO.

Instead, they put both jobs under a fairly young, inexperienced person who obviously spent more of her time on the job that meant more to her than the safety of her depositors money.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News