SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : PFE (Pfizer) How high will it go?
PFE 24.39-0.2%Nov 10 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dino who wrote (496)2/13/1998 2:57:00 AM
From: BigKNY3  Read Replies (2) of 9523
 
Dino: For this Board's comments, please find the following reference check:

The Pfizer Pipeline

TA <<PFE has IMHO and that of pharmacists I talked to a VERY WEAK NEW DRUG pipeline. They are living on old glories>>http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-340038
4

TA <<PFE does not have a rich pipeline of new, yet to to be announced, drugs per my hospital pharmacist, after they introduce what they've already announced; Trovan, Viagra and 1 or 2 more; what's left after that is poor>> www3.techstocks.com

Fact: In the March, 1997 issue of Med Ad News, the magazine concerning pharmaceutical business, the editors "took a close look at the new product pipelines of the top 50 pharmaceutical companies....One stands out as the best of the best: Pfizer".

Experience in evaluating Pharma Companies

TA <<I can't advise you because even though I am a physician I don't follow pharm Cos.>> www3.techstocks.com

Ability to predict PFE( with % change in PFE on the date of TA post as compared to today's PFE close of 84 15/16- the all-time high close in PFE's history)

TA post re: PFE on 9/30/97. PFE@ 60.25. PFE has increased 39.9% since post .http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-2311961

TA post re: PFE on 10/8/997. PFE@ 64.50. PFE has increased 30.7% since the post. <<should consider selling his PFE at the present high?>>http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-2389263

TA post re: PFE on 11/7/97: PFE@70 15/16. PFE has increased 18.9% since the post. <<IMHO, I would get out of PFE. Too high PE. 30?..I would buy some VVUS @227/16>> www3.techstocks.com

TA post on PFE and Drug Stocks on 1/19/98 <<PFE and drug stocks may be down even 50% if any threat to their future earnings is perceived>>http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-3202319

Fact: During the last 10 years, the largest PFE decline was -13.7% in 1992, the year President Clinton was elected. PFE has increased in 8 of these 10 years. Here are the yearly increases over the last 4 years; +12.0%,+63.1%,+31.7%, +79.7%. PFE is currently up 13.1% YTD.

TA post on PFE on 2/6/98: <<If Viagra is not approved in perfect condition, PFE will drop 20 points in one day>>http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-3359217

Viagra Approval Predictions

TA post 10/8/97 : <<Viagra probably 1 year (or never) away from approval>>

TA Post 1/8/97 << Viagra delay; I think the FDA is in the process of reading the following mess and is noe taking a harder look at what they approve>>http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-3123463

Fact: Later that day, the FDA approved a new antiobesity drug Meredia.

Hey, it's only a Roman Numeral

TA Post on a a Science article that concerns only PDE-VI inhibitors not the PDE-Vs which includes Viagra.
www3.techstocks.com

TA incorrectly refers to this article as evidence of PDE-V in the retina.http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-3302238

TA incorrectly lists PDE-V for the penis and retina. No reference provided.http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-3209954

Newbridge Networks- Am I out or in? It depends on the Board.

TA Post on 1/17/98 <<still holding at 33>>http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-3192488

TA post on 1/23/98 << Hanging around 30 until folks are reassured by Matthews in 1 month at EPS CC. Which he will do; he'll say" chill out folks; we are doing dandy ; we'll fix UBS, go out and have a beer and stop worrying , we are No. 1 .>> www3.techstocks.com

Meanwhile TA post on VVUS on 1/26/98 <<I sold NN today and bought more VVUS @14.7>> www3.techstocks.com

Fact: no corresponding post by TA on the NN Board.

TA post on VVUS on 2/3/98 <<Newbridge Networks tanked this am. I'd gotten out of it 2 weeks ago>> www3.techstocks.com

TA post on NN on 2/7/98 <<I am still holding on my VNW 20 Jan 99 NN leaps and a smaller (800 shares) than my previous 20K NN shares position>>http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-3368059

Respect for Urologists and Key MUSE investigators

www3.techstocks.com
www3.techstocks.com

Reaction to a Niagra Falls Ad (An ad that never existed)

www3.techstocks.com
www3.techstocks.com

Killer drugs are the #1 successful model for truly impotent men?

TA post: 11/7/97 <<Phosphodiesterase inhibitors are killer cardiac drugs>>http://www3.techstocks.com/~wsapi/investor/reply-2669865

TA post:11/11/97 <<The No 1 successful model that I see for truly impotent men is Viagra WITH MUSE>> www3.techstocks.com
4

An honest post that you really can believe. www3.techstocks.com

_____________________

All investors... beware of the bias and hidden agendas of posters on investor boards. Do your homework and research.

Best of luck with your investing!

BigKNY3
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext