Kirk's Market Thoughts Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts

COHR 178.36

0.0%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kirk © who wrote (15950)	5/9/2023 10:14:18 AM
From: robert b furman	Read Replies (1) of 26769

Exactly RIGHT! That's called moving the goal post on solar. They put an incentive out there and people took advantage of it. Then PG&E saw te revunue loss and wanted to change the game. I say OK ,change the game, but grandfather those who took your word for it. If it worked so well - why are there brown outs still? If it was so hugely successful and you waited to change the rules - you were a sleep at the switch and should pay the price for sleeping. Wisconsin has those insulate the poor people's homes, buy them electric water heaters etc. In a way, it is better than a wealth transfer, in that iT endorses conservation, that more than likely would not be accomplished OTHERWISE. The cost of alcohol and cigarettes are both very high you know. <smile> It's the pure wealth transfers that are based on income that becomes a slippery slope that regulators and the politicians that appoint them can not refuse to enlarge (so they can address the unintended consequences of their initial crappy ideas). Its like wiping your butt with a wagon wheel - ain't no end to it! Bob

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next