Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 160.90

-0.3%

10:12 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (8522)	2/14/1998 1:05:00 PM
From: DTA	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Ramsey, Couple of thoughts concerning takeover scenarios that have been getting recent attention. If Jacobs, White, and Viterbi, etc, did not believe in the longterm viability of their enterprise, then why did they embed antitakeover measures? To conclude that they did so just to gain buyout negotiating leverage doesn't make enough sense. Moreover, as long as Q is solvent and gaining acceptance across a range of markets (given the ETSI decision, among others)where questions seem to be leading toward solutions enabled only by Q IPRs and products, why would a price of even $100 get attention? Seems here that Q is one of the few companies that will determine how and where and in what form information will move over the next 10 years. Despite temporary problems in Asia and maybe some advertising deficits, Q to me still looks like an IBM.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next