Wharfie, they counted every instance of a suburban white guy shouting anti-Asian slurs as part of the mix.
But I think there's a huge difference between a white loser who is shouting anti-Asian slurs, and some "unhoused" person in the city mugging, stabbing, or otherwise causing serious injury to Asians.
Even this study admits the disparity, though they do it in a way that draws some sort of moral equivalence between the two:
Karthick Ramakrishnan, founder of AAPI Data, for which Wong also works, said that the public’s perception of perpetrators and victims is largely formed by the images from videos that have gone viral. But most security videos tend to be from low-income areas where there is more surveillance than in better-off areas, creating a lopsided impression, he said. First of all, that's bullshit. "Better-off areas" are practically covered in Ring cameras.
And second, you don't see too many videos of anti-Asian hate crimes in "better-off areas" because of what I said before. The more serious hate crimes tend to go viral more often than some white loser shouting at Asians.
Bottom line is that you're reposting boba liberal bullshit, Wharfie, just as you are expected to.
Tenchusatsu |
