FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL)

FTEL 0.850

+4.7%

Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Judith who wrote (28064)	2/14/1998 4:35:00 PM
From: VALUESPEC	Read Replies (2) of 41046

Judith, thanks for your respectful approach to me, despite our differences. I will address your points as follows: <<. . . you would have noticed that I posted the basic terms of the WCOM deal as defined by Helen.>> Judith, my challenge was for someone to tell me what WCOM representatives are saying, not FTEL representatives. Go to the following link, that I've shared in the past, as to why I think WCOM should be contracted: Asking the used car salesman about the used car you are looking at: valuespec.com@EDUCATIONAL/AboutCEOandPRcomments.html As for repeating myself, I think that is natural. Look how many times the bulls repeat themselves. However, I will make an attempt to try to not repeat myself as much, unless someone's post directly requires it. VALUESPEC

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next