We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon
Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
this below curated show was done 5 years ago, and at 57:13 mark an Ukrainian military journalist asked a question, and the answer, in hindsight, was spot-on, that being 'long-range indirect-fire artillery', which to you and I means everything we are watching in Ukraine playing out, unstoppable fire raining from the sky gradually but assuredly reducing the brave nation back to the stone age because its 'friends' cowardly did and are doing rug-pull.
The overall conclusion of the show is that Russia is weak (never mind that Ukraine cannot win), Nato can run circles around Russia with aviation, but failing to explain how Nato would penetrate Russian air-defence with triggering a nuclear escalation. Also, Ukraine can deter Russia by remaining able to hurt after being flattened.
In the meantime this day I received below, and if I was sitting in Kremlin, I see invasion by salami-ing.
I fear for Finland that is joining Nato, and am hoping that Turkey might still do Sweden a big favour by voting against Sweden joining same Nato. IOW do not hang out with rug-pulling cretins that suggest the way to deter Russia is to signal capability / capacity to keep Russia hurting after being flattened by Russia. Bad strategy, am guessing.
Finland might wish to consider joining BRICS+ / SCO, and get on with build build build.
