SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Da_cheifs vomitorium
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mongo2116 who wrote (6973)7/22/2023 11:02:41 PM
From: #Breeze2 Recommendations

Recommended By
DD™
rdkflorida2

   of 7553
 
Mongo, PS is now aware that his ABC wave bearish count is a bust. So, on Friday he posted a revised bearish wave count. I’ve modeled the progression of his wave count to its conclusion of a price for Super Cycle (II). And that price is 282.82. Not a typo. This his most absurd wave count to date.

He posits that Cycle Waves [1} and [2] are complete and Cycle Wave [3] is in play.

I’ve modeled the price for Cycle Waves [3], [4] and [5] and that would conclude Cycle Wave [A] at price of 1782.

Then a Cycle Wave would retrace 50% of the Cycle [A] decline to a price of 3297.81.

Thereafter, a Cycle Wave [C] decline (whose magnitude would equal Cycle [A]) will conclude at a price of 282.82 to conclude Super Cycle (II).

Here's that modeled wave count.

tradingview.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News