Da_cheifs vomitorium Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Da_cheifs vomitorium

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: #Breeze	7/23/2023 9:39:20 AM
	2 Recommendations Recommended By Mongo2116 Steve Redding Read Replies (1) of 7553

Mongo, as I expected PS was triggered by my post. He just wrote: "My chart shows that we are in [2] of Cycle wave A of SuperCycle (II) which will be a cycle degree ABC. Due to the retrace the count went from an AB to a [1,2]. Any novice EW can look at this chart and see that wave [2] is an ABC". The chart I posted was a projective wave count of his silly notion. Below is are diagrams of an Elliott Wave ABC zig zag. At the upper left you'll see the first three steps in the journey he's tacking his subs. He's projecting Armageddon. All I did was take his ridiculous wave count to its conclusion to a price of 282. He went on to say: "....You cannot figure out how 4818 to 3491 could be [1] due to your limited knowledge of Elliott Wave." I have a response: Well dumbass why did it take you 9 months to label the Oct low as a Wave [1]. The reason is that you're not an experienced Elliott Wave practitioner. If you were you would not have revised your primary wave count THREE times. When the SPX makes an ATH your current count will get invalidated. tradingview.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next