SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LoneClone who wrote (78043)7/27/2023 2:14:10 PM
From: stuffbug   of 78404
 
The dispute concerns the sections of Treaty Creek which will eventually be converted into a statutory right of way (12.5 km).

"Once the MTT are constructed, the Licence will be converted into a statutory right of way for the entire length of the MTT, including the 12.5 km of the MTT that pass through mineral claims owned by Tudor."

I suspect Tudor realizes the Treaty Creek project will be logistically unmineable should Seabridge acquire a permanent right of way through their claims.

-----------------------------

The deepest irony is that in the end either SEA will buy Treaty Creek for themselves, or someone bigger will buy both SEA and Treaty Creek, uniting all the property, disputed or not, into one.

I agree. However, if the Treaty Creek mineral claims are unmineable on their own, then Tudor has a very poor bargaining position as the seller. Take whatever crumbs are offered or end up with nothing.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News