<<You seem to be implying that WCOM is dissatisfied with FTEL in this regard. Rather than accusing other members of this tread of having these facts and not sharing this information with the thread, why don't you just share the facts of what you know about this with the thread. It would be so much more productive if you would drop the use of innuendo and use verifiable fact instead.>>
The innuendo is that if WCOM representatives were saying the collocation deal is significant in that it is difficult to get and that FTEL seems like a company going places, then the bulls would probably have said that. The lack of posts leads me to believe the collocation deal is somewhat insignificant and not worthy of a great deal of excitement as one might have been lead to believe in reading past FTEL bull posts on that subject.
Why has no one called WCOM? I haven't yet, but I will soon, in an attempt to go one step further in showing my concerns are valid (or not).
<< By the way, in your post to Judith, your reference to your link, "http://www.valuespec.com/reports/@EDUCATIONAL/AboutCEOandPRc..." seemed pretty irrelevant, to me.
Thank you.
Cliff>>
Cliff, that post was relevant, in my opinion, in that it shows the folly in only relying on the people who represent the opposing interests (your interest is in getting a clear picture of the significance of any FTEL collocation news, etc).
I hope that helps.
VALUESPEC |
