I MIGHT have been saving the best for last- I doubt it, we'll have to wait and see, not jump the cliff yet.
>>Now the question is, was he selling before or after he got the 14 page memo from the SEC?<<
Whats in it? You are sensationalizing, on purpose. Like the national inquirer.
>>Any savvy investor knows, that word of an investigation by the SEC
will bring price down. That was why Joe was so mad when word of
the SEC got out.<<
Perhaps, I doubt this one too. you're trying to push people off the cliff- I tell you the lemmings are almost gone.
>>Up until the truth about the SEC investigation was widespread, Ole
Joe was saying he'd file within 2-3 weeks. What he wasn't saying was
that Wed. was the deadline. Now I ask you, was Joe providing
complete information or is he Bill Clinton's understudy?<<
So if the SEC can wait until Wednesday, why can't you? I need more examples of lies by Joe than this. You don't know all the FACTS surrounding the company either. You still can't show with FACTS that the company is more malicious than you are to it. You know how lucky you are on the internet saying this about them. Talk is so damn cheap.
It appears as though you have more of a mission than just saving 'innocent' investors from thinking out their own plans. If anyone reads your material and acts on it, they deserve the full 'benefit' of your advice. I hope you follow it too. You've cut bait and are not a supporter of the company. If you hold stock, you're shooting your foot off, I mean it. If you don't, give FACTS, not sensationalism please, to support your 'arguments', or do you only have 'till wednesday to get your 'message' out? I think you do, somehow. Prove me a dirty scummy neophyte, c'mon!!! I say you can't stop disrespecting a mile a minute 'till wednesday!!! NO WAY IN HELL!!! (jmho.) |
