SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives
SPY 683.38+0.1%Nov 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ken Adams who wrote (189327)8/16/2023 1:57:34 PM
From: h_1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Ken Adams

   of 218745
 
I would seek out old-type hearing aids that don't communicate with each other or a handheld control unit, or failing that, there are likely modern ones with an off switch for that feature. This is an extremely complicated topic and the telecommunications industry makes billions of dollars off of the technology with complicit governments who reap the tax dollars, so they have plenty of money to rig "$cience" to show that it's not harmful. Some are more obviously susceptible and they're labelled as suffering from "EHS," (electromagnetic hypersensitivity) but everybody including animals are susceptible to the negative health effects.

Having a microwave transmitter that close to the brain, eyes and auditory systems, not to mention salivary glands etc. is an unnecessary risk. It's not the power level of the carrier that does the damage because it's not thermal damage, it's the modulation that disrupts neural signalling and normal cellular function. There are thousands of studies showing harm, but industry manages to keep doubt alive, just like the tobacco industry did for decades.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext