SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives
SPY 681.44+1.6%Nov 10 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (189330)8/16/2023 2:24:12 PM
From: h_1 Recommendation

Recommended By
GROUND ZERO™

  Read Replies (1) of 218674
 
A quote from the gov't site: "These frequencies all fall in the non-ionizing range of the spectrum, which is low frequency and low energy. The energy is too low to damage DNA." is misdirection. While the frequencies themselves may not damage DNA directly, exposure to them disables the body's immune system's capability to repair naturally occurring damage. Everybody is in a constant battle with cancer; it's how your body controls it that determines whether you win or lose. All the choices you make including sleep, quality of light exposure, diet, toxin exposure etc. change your odds.


They also quote studies that have major flaws (which were likely intentional.) 3G, 4G, 5G are all bad, but as the modulation gets more advanced, the worse it gets for your nervous system. The particular carrier frequency is not as important as the duration of exposure and the type of modulation. What makes this subject more complicated than other toxin exposure issues is that it doesn't necessarily follow the typically expected dose-response curve: higher field densities are sometimes less harmful than lower. I believe it may be due to the novel nature of the modulation having to hit a threshold before the immune system can identify the threat. Regardless, oxidative stress is the result which causes chronic inflammation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News