SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1418207)9/7/2023 1:09:23 PM
From: Tenchusatsu3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Broken_Clock
Brumar89
PKRBKR

  Read Replies (1) of 1578716
 
The cancellation of Patrick Brown has already begun:

Editor of Nature journal slams climate scientist Patrick Brown's 'highly irresponsible' research after he said publications reject studies that don't 'support certain narratives' (msn.com)

Basically what this editor claims is that Patrick Brown did what he did "all on his own" and was not coerced or encouraged in any way to conform to a pre-determined narrative.

And because Patrick Brown did what he did "all on his own," he is therefore guilty of "poor research practices."

In other words, the response is predictable and unsurprising. Denial and projection.

Because it's Brown's fault and Brown's fault alone that he didn't mention how 80% of wildfires are caused by humans.

Doesn't that contradict what you've been saying, Wharfie, that Brown didn't need to say that because it is completely and 100% irrelevant to the true nature of climate change's role in wildfires?

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News