SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.75+3.6%Nov 24 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (47910)2/15/1998 10:46:00 PM
From: Jay  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Paul,

I haven't been keeping up with the details of the new video chips.

But I can think of a pressing need for more CPU power in one area
right now - I have been planning to digitize all my family home
videos - and put them into CR-R disks which now cost just a buck apiece. I've tried this using my child's Sony VAIO computer but
beyond 320x200 pixels the result is far from satisfactory on playback.

I haven't tried to figure out whether the problem is in the recording
or in the playback - but here is one application that many home users
can use right now.

After all who wants to rewind/fast forward through
all the shaky hand held camera shots to get to truly important memories on tape? A second factor is that tape longevity is probably
much less than a CD's (?).

BTW the computer is a Pentium 233 (not a P II)

I did a little bit of asking around and found out that the Matrox
Rainbow runner claims to save at ~700x500 (max NTSC res) but I
didn't want to spend another $400 to find out.

Do you know where the problem is and who might benefit from this
type of need?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext