Re: CSHK references on SI
From cursory reading on SI, it appears that several months ago a newsletter, "Stock For Tomorrow", by a guy named Mark Scultz, was being accused of manipulating CSHK. Don't know much more than what I referenced below, though.
This post talks about Mark Scultz's reputation:
==========
HE'S BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Scultz picks up on AWLT in his latest update.
SAYS, heading for .60???????
He must have covered his short, got sone cheap shares, will dump those after the latest pump, and short again.
207.183.153.23
==========
This post is response to increased volume in AWLT:
==========
According to Mark S, it was in the Corporate Section of II.
for November.
Regardless, of his reputation it was nice to see people make money on AWLT. He was right on the money Monday when he said .60 cents wasn't he??
The guy does have a nack for moving stocks. His latest conquest CSHK was selling for about .10 a week ago, went to 3/8 the day before he hyped it, after that almost broke a $1. Go figure??
207.183.153.23
==========
Lastly, this:
==========
Gee, if small BB stocks like AWLT, CSHK and all this type of crap can move why not STGA??
207.183.153.23
==========
And my opinion? Anyone that buys into a Y2K stock because they just got listed on a Y2K web site should have their head examined. Sure the price might go sky high-- that will be your and every other suckers' money pumping it up while those in the know dump. At that point you won't even have made back the spread and will be forced to watch the price slowly drop back down... and your hopes of even making a penny with it.
But, then again... I could be wrong (gg).
- Jeff
P.S. Do a search on "Mark Schultz" and "Mark Scultz". He seems to have incited people's wrath. |
