I started a bit over a year ago I suppose.
The premise, still unproven (probably always will be): There is a relationship(s) between astro turns, cycles and waves. Like said it is difficult.
Hickson in any event stresses the top to top or bottom to bottom approach on cycles. I have noticed he is off a lot, he just says the cycle ended early or late, or we need more data, or ..... I currently question this, and think maybe the bottom to top and top to bottom (of waves more than likely) come into play. It then presents a lot of possibilities in how the top to top or bottom to bottom approach would ultimately turn out. You have to slice and dice and do a lot of addition of minor cycles. But who said it would be easy.
Like with the Spx chart ... if no low here, then we have another possibility very early Nov, dead ahead. There are always planetary conjuctions coming up, just on my main turn algo I am presently using, my best looking turn was a few days ago.
In any event I think we are close here to a turn. Think we are starting to see a wee bit of divergence.
I might get an FFT (fast fourier transform) algorithm for Excel, compute my own cycle lengths. But afa as I know the output would depend a hair on how the data is windowed and input into the algo. Not sure how I would handle the trading days vs. calendar days. The fast fourier transform theory is based on infinite data, so the algo does some things to compensate.
It there is anything to all this it could be quite value adding to those in particular who play options, and/or the 3X funds. Timing gets quite critical.
Tweets |
